competitive schooling.
Tue, Aug. 15th, 2017 09:14 pmLast week I got my score back in my maths test and I got 35%. To understand the situation, you'll need some background. so:
- I do the second maths stream called maths methods, we call it math for short because
- it is hard as balls. The sort of thing where your friends ask "why the fuck did you choose that?" because they are worried for your health. Most people drop it after the first year, and I rather wish I had
- in year twelve in Victoria (my state), 30% is a pass. Their expectations are very low, I expect by now they're just hoping we finish it.
I am very pleased with my 35%. It is better than I have done on other tests and better than I expected (especially as if I failed, I'd have to do more work for a subject I can barely tolerate). Most people do it to go on to do sciences in uni. I am more of an arts/humanities person so I don't know why I'm doing it anymore but here I am. They ended up boosting everyone's marks because they realised in hindsight how difficult the test was. Actually, my 35% was the average mark and my teacher said it is normal for the average to be below 50% for these types of tests which is ridiculous. If you design a test for a class you teach to be too difficult for 50% of your students to understand even half of it, you're doing a bad job at either teaching or designing tests.
I am not planning on taking my maths methods anywhere and like I said I was pleased but my father? oh boy.
He's annoyed. And not just because I didn't do as well as he would have liked but because I'm fine with not doing as well as he would have liked. He's convincing me I'm not doing enough work, and it makes me feel guilty, like I'll never do enough or be enough and honestly I've felt like that for too long, I'm sick of it.
I know that's probably not his intention. I expect he's just hoping it motivates me to suddenly care more for that specific subject and be proud of putting all my effort into it. Meanwhile, I devote more of my time and energy to the subjects I adore like theatre and studio art and German or the ones I at least hope to do well in like English literature. I'm fine with doing mediocre in methods and doing far better in my other subjects, and I've told my dad this, yet he wants me to be unhappy with this result. I'm not put out by his comments but i keep stewing over them, on his assumptions and motivations. This won't even help me in life, it is just him wanting my values to be the same as his, and they are not. For while we often have the same interests, we just as often come to different conclusions (as the radical nb child of a liberal cishet man).
My education is not a competition. Nor does it have bearing on how I see myself. I do not care that I may be doing worse, better than or equal to my peers. My education is something I love and am forever grateful for. And I resent anyone who tries to change that for me.
- I do the second maths stream called maths methods, we call it math for short because
- it is hard as balls. The sort of thing where your friends ask "why the fuck did you choose that?" because they are worried for your health. Most people drop it after the first year, and I rather wish I had
- in year twelve in Victoria (my state), 30% is a pass. Their expectations are very low, I expect by now they're just hoping we finish it.
I am very pleased with my 35%. It is better than I have done on other tests and better than I expected (especially as if I failed, I'd have to do more work for a subject I can barely tolerate). Most people do it to go on to do sciences in uni. I am more of an arts/humanities person so I don't know why I'm doing it anymore but here I am. They ended up boosting everyone's marks because they realised in hindsight how difficult the test was. Actually, my 35% was the average mark and my teacher said it is normal for the average to be below 50% for these types of tests which is ridiculous. If you design a test for a class you teach to be too difficult for 50% of your students to understand even half of it, you're doing a bad job at either teaching or designing tests.
I am not planning on taking my maths methods anywhere and like I said I was pleased but my father? oh boy.
He's annoyed. And not just because I didn't do as well as he would have liked but because I'm fine with not doing as well as he would have liked. He's convincing me I'm not doing enough work, and it makes me feel guilty, like I'll never do enough or be enough and honestly I've felt like that for too long, I'm sick of it.
I know that's probably not his intention. I expect he's just hoping it motivates me to suddenly care more for that specific subject and be proud of putting all my effort into it. Meanwhile, I devote more of my time and energy to the subjects I adore like theatre and studio art and German or the ones I at least hope to do well in like English literature. I'm fine with doing mediocre in methods and doing far better in my other subjects, and I've told my dad this, yet he wants me to be unhappy with this result. I'm not put out by his comments but i keep stewing over them, on his assumptions and motivations. This won't even help me in life, it is just him wanting my values to be the same as his, and they are not. For while we often have the same interests, we just as often come to different conclusions (as the radical nb child of a liberal cishet man).
My education is not a competition. Nor does it have bearing on how I see myself. I do not care that I may be doing worse, better than or equal to my peers. My education is something I love and am forever grateful for. And I resent anyone who tries to change that for me.